{ "assessment_id": "2026-10-30-expanded", "assessment_period": { "basis": "From the earliest request in the archive (FOIA 25-94, submitted May 23, 2025) to the evidence cutoff.", "end": "2026-11-02", "start": "2025-05-23" }, "assessor_note": "Expanded assessment under methodology v1.2.0. All 16 archived FOIA requests, all 6 published case watches, the seven Aker-Horvath requests documented inside that case watch, the released documents and the county's public FOIA pages were reviewed against 37 indicators. FOIA 25-244 (Brady/Giglio service records, October 2025) was added on October 25, 2026 and lowered the scores on aggregate-data availability, the cost of obtaining existing data, nonexistence certifications, search-scope disclosure and fee communication. The Aker-Horvath records (26-136, 26-137, 26-139 and 26-140 through 26-143) were added on October 25, 2026. They corroborate the existing judgments rather than overturn them: four responses on the fourth business day with no fee support the timing and fee scores, while a bare certificate of nonexistence for sixteen categories of fingerprint records, two same-dated plea sheets that disagree on bond, and a request whose subject line reads 'Finger Prints' while enumerating plea documents support the existing low scores on nonexistence certifications and internal consistency. No indicator score was changed on this review. Case watches are admitted as evidence only where the page reproduces primary records verbatim and cites them. Indicators without enough traceable evidence carry no score; null is not zero. FOIA 25-277 (annual statistical reports, submitted November 25, 2025 and answered December 18, 2025) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the first itemization in the archive whose arithmetic reconciles, which raised the fee-itemization and fee-timeline scores; the letter and the itemization also agree on a 50% deposit and a 180-day clock for the first time. Against that, the response produced no records at all, priced data the office concedes exists at $34,720.00, omitted the fee appeal form, certified a redaction it had not yet performed, left the public-interest waiver section blank, and rested the whole estimate on a volume figure - roughly 1,000 files per year - that appears in five requests in this archive and has never been derived from a count. Twelve indicator scores moved: A1, A3, A4, A5, B1, C1, C2, C3, C4, E2, E3, E4, F1 and F5, with eight rising and six falling. All outstanding reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 25-278 (plea-bargaining practices, January 1, 2022 to present), submitted November 25, 2025 and answered December 18, 2025, was added on October 30, 2026. It is the literal twin of 25-277 - same requester, same filing day, same response day, same coordinator, same formula - which makes consistency across similar requests directly testable for the first time; the office is consistent, and the consistency is mechanical. The response is also the first of its class to produce actual records: a trial count by court and year totaling 62 trials over four years, plus SCAO Form MC 414 and a plea-offer revocation template. It volunteers a fuller migration account than the archive had, stating that the transition completed in June 2024 and explaining the field mismatch, which raised the historical and migration-transparency score. Against that, the office issued a second itemization the same day for the same review and conceded in its own footnotes that the second is 'moot' if the first is paid - $57,866.66 combined, $28,933.33 in deposits - and again priced a 4,000-file manual review to answer a question the internal calendar answered in 62 lines. Twenty indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; fourteen moved and six were confirmed unchanged. All 25-278 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 25-279 (personnel and resource data, FY 2020 through the current year), submitted November 25, 2025 and answered December 18, 2025, was added on October 30, 2026. It is the third request filed by the same requester on the same evening and answered by the same coordinator on the same day, and it is the most revealing of the three. The letter grants dozens of sub-items in prose - position classification lists back to 2009, headcount, turnover, training records by employee, thirteen travel authorizations, annual budgets, grant awards and fourteen grant-funded job descriptions - and encloses none of them. The 74-page packet is a letter, a denial form, two statute excerpts, a blank appeal form, a policy notice and three invoices. The invoices quote $176.96, $34,432.00 and $64.83, totaling $34,673.79 with $17,336.89 in deposits and clocks of 30, 180 and 30 days, and all three contain unreconciled arithmetic errors. The volume premise behind the largest invoice moved from '4 YEARS requested' in the twin requests to '6 YEARS requested' here without explanation. Against that, the response discloses real search scope, a fuller six-year position history than the archive had, and the clearest statement yet of the office's size - 8 employees, 3 attorneys, 12-15 vacancies - and of the limits that size imposes. Twenty indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; nineteen moved and one was confirmed unchanged. All 25-279 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 26-21 (total count of criminal convictions, 2023 through 2025), submitted January 30, 2026 and answered February 5, 2026, with an amended response dated February 12, 2026, was added on October 30, 2026. It is one of three statistical requests faxed the same day by the same requester - 26-20, 26-21 and 26-22 - all answered within days, all certified as producing no existing document, and all met with a fee quote built on the same estimate of case volume. The count was denied as a compilation under MCL 15.233(5) with a certificate of nonexistence under MCL 15.233(1), and the underlying files were priced at $9,548.00 with a $4,774.00 deposit and a 270-day estimate. The distinguishing fact is the amendment. The February 5 letter stated that the office processes 'approximately 1,500 files per year'; at the itemization's own 3-minute and 4-minute rates and $6.20 quarter-hour charge, that volume implies $13,020.00 and a $6,510.00 deposit, $3,472.00 more than the office quoted. The February 12 amendment changed the figure to 1,100 files per year - matching the invoice - and changed nothing else, including the fee, the deposit, both footnotes, the appeal paragraph and two typographical errors. A fee the office justified by volume did not move when volume fell 27 percent. Footnote 2 names requests 25-21 and 25-22 that do not exist in the archive, and the fee waiver was requested and never decided. Twenty-nine indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; thirteen moved and sixteen were confirmed unchanged. All 26-21 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 26-29 (total number of inherited criminal cases resulting in conviction) and FOIA 26-30 (total number of criminal cases initiated from the election date through December 31, 2025) were added on October 30, 2026. Both were submitted in the same week as 26-20, 26-21 and 26-22, making five statistical requests from one requester in a single week. 26-29 was received February 6 and answered February 12, 2026; the office reported it could not locate a record containing the total, defined 'inherited' by reference to a request outside the archive (26-28), and granted the underlying data subject to segregation at $1,033.33 with a $516.66 deposit, on a baseline of 500 files against an estimate of 800 to 1,000 open at any one time. Its itemization states that partial time increments must be rounded down, and at that rule line 3a is $409.20 rather than the $413.33 printed - a $4.13 overcharge - while the letter gives 180 days and the itemization 270 days, both dated the same day. 26-30 was received February 9 and answered February 12, 2026; the office named eight responsive documents and produced none, citing Densmore v. Department of Corrections as '203 Mich 363 (1994)' - correctly 203 Mich.App. 363 - while also certifying under MCL 15.233(5) that no document containing the total exists and stating that the total 'can be gleaned' from the documents it declined to produce. Six of the eight documents match what 25-195 produced; the two 21st Century Reports covering 2024 and 2025 do not appear in 25-94 or 25-195, and the Board of Commissioners' June 27, 2025 decision on the 25-94 appeal records those periods as denied, not produced. Sixteen indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; fifteen moved and one was confirmed unchanged. All 26-29 and 26-30 reassessment flags were resolved on this review, along with thirteen stale 25-279 flags left open by the prior scan. FOIA 26-28 (total number of criminal cases pending or in progress at the time the current prosecutor assumed office) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the first of the six statistical requests and the missing piece behind 26-29: that letter defines 'inherited' by citing FOIA 26-28 by number, and the citation is now verifiable in this archive and checks out. The office denied the existence of any record containing the total, certified that under MCL 15.233(1), granted the underlying data subject to segregation, and priced it at $1,653.33 with an $826.66 deposit - on a baseline of 800 files, drawn from the same sentence estimating 'approximately 800 to 1000 files open at any one time' that 26-29 used to reach 500 files on the same day in the same template. The itemization repeats 26-29's $4.13 overcharge against its own rounding rule ($657.20 rather than $661.33), its blank waiver section for the sixth consecutive file, and its 270-day estimate contradicting the letter's 180 days. The letter is the only one in the cluster to supply a worked example - a 2001 authorization arraigned in 2025 - and it is the first packet in the archive to supply both the denial appeal form and the excess-fee appeal form together. Sixteen indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; fifteen moved and one was confirmed unchanged. All 26-28 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 26-32 (impact of the system migration on the office's ability to respond to FOIA requests) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the largest production in the archive - five named records, 95 pages - and it answers the office's own earlier denial by releasing the migration memos it had previously withheld. The June 16, 2025 memo on Appeal of FOIA 25-94 states that the office 'went live with Karpel' on June 10, 2024; that 'the data did not transition completely, or accurately'; that the failure 'was a possibility that we were warned of prior to the implementation'; that 'access to the previous case tracking system or its exact data is no longer available'; and that files are 'organized by name (only by name),' so year-based search is 'not viable.' The January 2026 email thread adds that the office has not reentered the data because 'we don't have time,' and that a commissioner proposed a cheaper technical route through ProsecutorByKarpel's court-form ingestion. The denial in 26-32 is the narrowest in the archive: contact information only, MCL 15.243(1)(a), every substantive record released. Against that, the file exposes three different per-file time estimates for the same work - 20 minutes, 14 minutes and 5 minutes - and repeats the $4.13 fractional-increment overcharge on two lines of the 25-278 itemization. Twenty-three indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; twenty-one moved and two were confirmed unchanged. All 26-32 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 26-32 (impact of the system migration on the office's ability to respond to FOIA requests) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the largest production in the archive - five named records, 95 pages - and it answers the office's own earlier denial by releasing the migration memos it had previously withheld. The June 16, 2025 memo on Appeal of FOIA 25-94 states that the office 'went live with Karpel' on June 10, 2024; that 'the data did not transition completely, or accurately'; that the failure 'was a possibility that we were warned of prior to the implementation'; that 'access to the previous case tracking system or its exact data is no longer available'; and that files are 'organized by name (only by name),' so year-based search is 'not viable.' The January 2026 email thread adds that the office has not reentered the data because 'we don't have time,' and that a commissioner proposed a cheaper technical route through ProsecutorByKarpel's court-form ingestion. The denial in 26-32 is the narrowest in the archive: contact information only, MCL 15.243(1)(a), every substantive record released. Against that, the file exposes three different per-file time estimates for the same work - 20 minutes, 14 minutes and 5 minutes - and repeats the $4.13 fractional-increment overcharge on two lines of the 25-278 itemization. Twenty-three indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; twenty-one moved and two were confirmed unchanged. All 26-32 reassessment flags were resolved on this review. FOIA 26-35 (the January 2026 plea-agreement count) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the first file in the archive in which the office answered a request for an aggregate figure with the figure, at no charge, inside the statutory period. The letter reports 52 pleas drawn from District and Circuit Court dockets, concedes that the 52 includes misdemeanor traffic tickets and is therefore a ceiling rather than an exact count, states that no document or record of an aggregate numerical total exists, and reports that the compilation took approximately 85 minutes and was done 'out of a courtesy and effort in transparency.' Two things keep the file from raising the assessment much. First, the office's account of its own dates cannot be reconciled with the packet: the letter dates the request February 10 when it is dated February 9, states that the request was received February 17 when the enclosed fax notification records 2:05:51 p.m. on February 9, and says the plea was observed on February 9 in one sentence and January 9 five sentences later. Counted from February 9 the response is timely on the fifth business day only because February 16 is a state holiday. Second, the file sharpens the archive's central inconsistency: the same claim that no aggregate record exists produced a certification and a $1,653.33 invoice on February 12 and a free number on February 17, and the 85-minute figure is the only measured labor time in the archive -- about 1.63 minutes per plea, against the 20-, 14- and 5-minute per-file estimates quoted for comparable work elsewhere. Sixteen indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; fourteen moved and two were confirmed unchanged. No 26-35 reassessment flags were outstanding. FOIA 26-35 (the January 2026 plea-agreement count) was added on October 30, 2026. It is the first file in the archive in which the office answered a request for an aggregate figure with the figure, at no charge, inside the statutory period. The letter reports 52 pleas drawn from District and Circuit Court dockets, concedes that the 52 includes misdemeanor traffic tickets and is therefore a ceiling rather than an exact count, states that no document or record of an aggregate numerical total exists, and reports that the compilation took approximately 85 minutes and was done 'out of a courtesy and effort in transparency.' Two things keep the file from raising the assessment much. First, the office's account of its own dates cannot be reconciled with the packet: the letter dates the request February 10 when it is dated February 9, states that the request was received February 17 when the enclosed fax notification records 2:05:51 p.m. on February 9, and says the plea was observed on February 9 in one sentence and January 9 five sentences later. Counted from February 9 the response is timely on the fifth business day only because February 16 is a state holiday. Second, the file sharpens the archive's central inconsistency: the same claim that no aggregate record exists produced a certification and a $1,653.33 invoice on February 12 and a free number on February 17, and the 85-minute figure is the only measured labor time in the archive -- about 1.63 minutes per plea, against the 20-, 14- and 5-minute per-file estimates quoted for comparable work elsewhere. Thirty-one indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; sixteen moved and fifteen were confirmed unchanged. No 26-35 reassessment flags were outstanding. FOIA 26-290, 26-291 and 26-292 -- the three follow-ups drafted from this site's own potential-request list and sent October 25, 2026 -- were added on November 2, 2026. All three were received Monday October 26 and answered Thursday October 29, the third business day of the five the statute allows, making this the fastest batch in the archive. Speed is the only thing the batch demonstrates. 26-290 asked six questions about victim-services staffing and grant funding; five are labelled 'granted' and withheld under Densmore v Department of Corrections on the ground that the same records were produced in FOIA 25-279, a production that this site documents as containing no responsive documents at all -- a denial, a blank appeal form, a policy notice and three cost itemizations totalling $34,673.79 -- and the sixth question is not answered. 26-291 asked for a privilege log for what 25-195 withheld and received a nine-row table of documents that were produced, all authored by the Prosecutor, under a citation to 'MCL 15.243(9),' a subsection that does not exist; four paragraphs later the same letter says the records 'were not deemed privileged.' 26-292 asked for twelve monthly felony-authorization counts and was refused on the strength of the requester's own cost-saving scope limitation, which the office read as an exclusion of the number it had just said 'could be located and provided.' That is the third written concession in this archive that the underlying data exists while the aggregate is withheld, after 25-278 and 26-28. Across the batch: no fee quoted, no cost estimate, no Notice of Denial form, no count of records withheld in full or in part, no waiver determination, and the sixth item of every request left unanswered. Thirty-six indicators were reviewed and their notes rewritten; twenty-eight moved and eight were confirmed unchanged. No 26-29x reassessment flags were outstanding. FOIA 26-34 (the aggregate number of criminal cases resolved through diversion programmes, 2022-2025), faxed February 9, 2026 and answered February 17, 2026, was added on November 2, 2026. It is the sibling of 26-35: the two requests arrived in the same afternoon's fax traffic at 1:18 and 2:05 p.m., were clarified by the same 1:22 p.m. e-mail, and were answered on the same day by the same coordinator. 26-35 was granted in full, with a count of 52 pleas produced in 85 minutes at no charge. 26-34 was denied outright, and the denial is definitional rather than exemption-based: the office narrowed 'diversion programs' to juvenile diversion administered by Probate Courts under the Juvenile Diversion Act, Act 13 of 1988, MCL 722.821 et seq., asserted that 'There are no other diversion programs within Delta County', and checked box 2, Record Does Not Exist, on the Denial Form. The certificate states that a search occurred but names no system searched, no custodian consulted and no date range applied, and the letter cites no subsection of MCL 15.243. The packet also carries three different receipt dates for one fax -- February 9 on the request form and the IPFone log, February 10 on the Denial Form, and February 17 in the response letter -- and the office's own forwarded e-mail of February 9 at 1:22 p.m. states that the two requests 'just came in' that day. The response is timely on all three readings because February 16, 2026 was a state holiday, so the response-timing indicator is unaffected and its score is unchanged. Nine indicator scores were reviewed: A3, B5, C1, C3, E2, F1 and F4 fell; A6 rose, because the office expressly invited clarifying information and offered to 'review the matter anew'; E5 was already at its floor and is unchanged in score but not in substance. All outstanding reassessment flags were resolved on this review.", "evidence_cutoff": "2026-11-02", "indicators": { "A1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-request-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-request-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-request-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-request-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-request-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-request-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-request-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-request-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-request-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-request-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-197-extension", "EV-25-197-fax-record", "EV-25-197-request", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-fax-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-request-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-request-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-request-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-request-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-request-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-request-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-140-26-140-143-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-fax-and-notices-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-request-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-itemization-and-fax-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-request-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-request", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-request", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-35-fax", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-fax", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-31-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "All three October 29, 2026 letters were received Monday October 26 and issued Thursday October 29 -- the third business day of the five MCL 15.235(1) allows, and the fastest turnaround in the archive. The score rises. It is held well below a high mark because speed is the only dimension on which these three files perform: two of the three letters use the extra time they saved to produce nothing. 26-33 is timely and its dates reconcile across the letter, the denial form and the itemization: received February 10, 2026, answered February 17, 2026, the fifth business day once the February 16 holiday is excluded. That internal consistency is a positive, and the score rises slightly. 26-31 was acknowledged February 9, 2026 and answered February 12, 2026 -- three business days, well inside MCL 15.235(2) -- and the dates reconcile across the letter, the denial form and the fax record. Prompt, internally consistent handling is a positive and the score edges up.", "score": 77, "status": "sufficient" }, "A2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-197-extension", "EV-25-197-request", "EV-25-200-25-200-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-denial-forms-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-request-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-request-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-request-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-request", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-request", "EV-25-279-request", "EV-25-279-extension", "EV-26-21-request", "EV-26-29-request", "EV-26-30-request", "EV-26-28-request", "EV-26-32-request", "EV-26-35-fax", "EV-26-35-request", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No extension was taken on any of the three, and all three requests were narrow, self-limiting and unambiguous on their face. The score rises slightly. 26-292 is the cautionary case: the office answered inside three business days by reading the requester's own scope limitation as a withdrawal, which is a fast answer to a question that was never asked.", "score": 58, "status": "sufficient" }, "A3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-197-denial-form", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-appeal-form-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-denial-forms-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-forms-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-140-26-140-143-response-redacted", "EV-26-141-26-141-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-25-279-denial-form", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-21-denial-form", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-29-denial-form", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-30-denial-form", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-28-denial-form", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-32-denial", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-34-denial-form", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-denial-form", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-denial-form" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "This is the batch that damages the indicator. 26-290 uses the word 'granted' five times and produces nothing, without citing a subsection of MCL 15.243 or attaching a denial form. 26-291 answers a request for a privilege log with a table of documents that were produced and cites a statutory subsection that does not exist. 26-292 concedes the records 'could be located and provided' and then declines. All three leave the sixth item of the request unanswered. Required content -- disposition, authority, documents, count -- is missing in each. The score falls. 26-34 adds a fourth variant to the batch. The response is a denial, so a disposition is present, but the Denial Form leaves the 'FOIA Section 13, Subsection ___' line blank and records no exemption at all, and the letter supplies no description of what was searched. Required content -- disposition, authority, documents, count -- is present in form and empty in substance. The score falls. 26-33 is close to a model response on the required-content test. It cites MCL 15.233(4) as the basis for declining to create an aggregate, attaches a certificate of nonexistence, checks box 2 on the Notice of Denial, describes the category of material to be separated, and reproduces the MCL 15.240 appeal notice. The score rises. 26-31 states a disposition ('your request is DENIED'), attaches a Notice of Denial, and encloses the MCL 15.240 appeal notice and a blank appeal form. But the denial form's checked box (1, section 13) does not match the authority the letter invokes (Densmore, a duplicative-request case), and the letter never describes the search behind its eight-item list. The score edges down on the mismatch.", "score": 45, "status": "sufficient" }, "A4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-cost-itemization-2025-09-02", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-22-26-22-itemization-and-fax-redacted", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-PROC", "EV-25-215-25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-35-request", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-itemization" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No fee was quoted on any of the three, which is the right outcome, but the MCL 15.234 waiver was requested on all three and is not mentioned in any of them. A waiver that is never addressed cannot be granted, denied or appealed. The score falls slightly. 26-33 supplies a full, checkable itemization with hourly wage, per-task split, increment counts and a 50% deposit. It is marred by two defects: the redaction line charges 586.66 increments on a form that twice requires partial increments to be rounded down (586 increments would be $3,633.20, not $3,637.33), and the MCL 15.234 waiver is left blank. The score edges up on completeness, held down by the rounding error and the undecided waiver. 26-31 quotes no fee and issues no estimate, so this indicator is largely untested by the record; the office simply refused to reproduce the documents at no charge. The score holds.", "score": 24, "status": "sufficient" }, "A5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-118-25-118-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-cost-itemization-2025-09-02", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-itemization-and-fax-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-itemization", "EV-26-31-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "None of the three letters contains a cost estimate, a deposit figure or a timeline. On 26-290 and 26-291 that is consistent with a no-charge answer. On 26-292 it is not: the office says records 'could be located and provided' subject to redaction -- work that carries a cost elsewhere in this archive -- and quotes nothing, then invites a clarified request without saying what it would cost. The score falls slightly. 26-33 issued its estimate the same day it responded, inside the statutory window, and states a 270-day deposit-to-production estimate. The estimate is documented and the timing is prompt, though the production interval itself is prospective and cannot yet be verified. The score rises slightly. 26-31 was answered in three business days and quoted no fee and no deposit, so there is no estimate to test. The prompt timing is a positive; the score holds.", "score": 28, "status": "sufficient" }, "A6": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-request-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-request-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-request-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-request-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-request-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-request-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-request-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-request-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-request-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-request-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-request-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-request-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-request-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "The stated action was not completed on any of the three. 26-290 answered five of six items with a refusal and skipped the sixth. 26-291 answered three of six with a list and denied two as nonexistent, skipping the sixth. 26-292 answered none of the four paragraphs with records, deferring the whole request to a clarification the office did not ask for. The score falls. 26-34 is the one item in this run that moves the other way. The letter closes by inviting 'clarifying information related to this request' and offering that 'we will review the matter anew'. That is a real avenue for reconsideration, offered in writing and without a fee, and the indicator credits it. The credit is qualified: the clarification the office asks for is a clarification of the requester's vocabulary, not of the office's search, so the burden of guessing which words the office will accept is placed on the requester. The score rises slightly.", "score": 44, "status": "sufficient" }, "B1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-request-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-request-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-request-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-request-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-133-25-133-request-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-request-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-request-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-request-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-request-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-request-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-request-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2018-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2019-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2020-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2021-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-197-kobasic-filings", "EV-25-197-kobasic-settlement", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-197-roberts-filings", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-request-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-request-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-responsive-court-data", "EV-25-234-25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-request-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-240-25-240-request-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-request-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-responsive-documents-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-request-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-141-26-141-responsive-documents", "EV-26-142-26-142-responsive-documents", "EV-26-143-26-143-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-request-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-request-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-130", "EV-CW-25-132", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-CW-nelson", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-254-produced-records", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-278-trial-table", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-25-279-grant-without-enclosure", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-31-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "Zero pages were produced across the three files. 26-291's nine-row table is typed into the body of a letter rather than released as a document, and 26-290 and 26-292 produced nothing at all. The score falls. 26-33 produced no records because the deposit was not paid, but the letter grants the underlying data in principle and explains why the compiled aggregate is not produced. The production outcome is unchanged: zero pages released. The score holds. 26-31 produced zero pages: the office listed eight records and refused to reproduce them as duplicative. The production outcome is unchanged from the prior baseline and the score holds, edging down because the refusal rests on an unverified prior production.", "score": 35, "status": "sufficient" }, "B2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2018-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2019-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2020-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2021-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-241-25-241-responsive-documents-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-responsive-documents", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-141-26-141-responsive-documents", "EV-25-254-produced-records", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-trial-table", "EV-26-291-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "There is almost nothing to assess for legibility: the only produced content in the batch is a nine-row table in a letter, which is legible and readable. The score falls slightly because the batch as a whole supplies no documents whose usability could be judged.", "score": 60, "status": "sufficient" }, "B3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-responsive-documents-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-denial-form", "EV-26-21-denial-form", "EV-26-29-denial-form", "EV-26-30-denial-form", "EV-26-28-denial-form", "EV-26-32-denial", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-290 withholds five items under a 1994 Court of Appeals case rather than a statutory exemption, and identifies no record as withheld. 26-291 asserts privilege and then withdraws it in the same letter, and gives no count of records withheld in full or in part. 26-292 withholds everything and labels the withholding a scope problem. The score falls.", "score": 33, "status": "sufficient" }, "B4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-142-26-142-responsive-documents", "EV-26-143-26-143-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-130", "EV-CW-25-130-lab", "EV-CW-25-131", "EV-CW-25-132", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-CW-nelson", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-25-279-grant-without-enclosure", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "The batch adds three fresh internal defects. 26-290 relies on a production, 25-279, that contains no responsive documents, and asserts that the same records were 'previously provided' without citing a page. 26-291 cites 'MCL 15.243(9)' -- section 15.243 ends at subsection (4) -- and contradicts its own privilege position four paragraphs later. 26-292 quotes the requester's scope limitation accurately and then applies it backwards. The score falls to the floor region.", "score": 6, "status": "sufficient" }, "B5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-unmeasured-premise", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-290 explains no search and cites no page of the earlier production. 26-291 gives no count of records reviewed, withheld or released. 26-292 does name the system the report came from -- the old case-tracking system the office says it can no longer access -- which is a real disclosure of retrieval limits, but it is offered as a reason for refusal rather than as search scope. The score falls slightly. 26-34 is the clearest search-scope failure in the archive. The certification states that a search occurred, but the packet names no system searched, no custodian consulted and no date range applied; the only scope statement in the letter is a definition of the word 'diversion'. A requester cannot test, and a court cannot review, a search that is described only as having happened. The score falls.", "score": 33, "status": "sufficient" }, "C1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-180-25-180-request-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2018-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2019-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2020-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2021-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-responsive-court-data", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-278-trial-table", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-sibling-contrast", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-eight-record-list", "EV-26-31-prior-production-absent" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-292 is the third written concession that the underlying data exists while the aggregate is refused, after 25-278 and 26-28, and it is the most explicit: 'Records allowing for the number to be calculated could be located and provided.' The office's demonstrated capacity to produce aggregate data has not changed, and neither has its practice of not doing so. The score falls slightly. 26-34 asks for one number the office's own case system can produce, and the office answers that the category does not exist. This is a narrower failure than 26-292's concession that 'records allowing for the number to be calculated could be located and provided', because here the office denies the premise rather than the effort. Either way the aggregate is refused. The score falls slightly. 26-33 is a fourth written concession that the underlying data exists while the aggregate is refused: 'the underlying data exists to allow for the calculation.' But the data was not provided -- it was priced at $9,093.33 -- so the demonstrated capacity to supply existing aggregate data remains unrealised in practice. The score edges down. 26-31 answered a request for 'aggregate numerical data only' with an inventory of eight withheld documents and no figure. A list of eight is itself a count, yet the office neither presents it as the answer nor states that eight is the total, and it declines to reproduce the underlying items. The demonstrated capacity to supply existing data remains unrealised. The score edges down.", "score": 30, "status": "sufficient" }, "C2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-cost-itemization-2025-09-02", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-itemization-and-fax-redacted", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-PROC", "EV-25-215-25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-unmeasured-premise", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-33-itemization" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-35 itself was free, but it does not change the cost of obtaining existing data across the archive, where the same kind of aggregate was priced at $1,653.33 four days earlier. The score holds at the floor region. 26-33 prices the underlying data behind a single statistic at $9,093.33 with a $4,546.66 deposit and a 270-day estimate. The fee is itemized, but as a practical matter it operates as a barrier to a one-number request, and the itemization contains a rounding error in the county's favour. The score holds at the floor region. 26-31 quotes no fee at all; the barrier here is a duplicative-refusal, not cost. With no fee itemization to assess, the indicator is essentially untested and the score holds near the floor region.", "score": 8, "status": "sufficient" }, "C3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-denial-forms-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-140-26-140-143-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-132", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-CW-nelson", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-34-denial-form", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-sibling-contrast", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-eight-record-list", "EV-26-31-prior-production-absent" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-291 denies two items as nonexistent and 26-292 denies one, with no certification, no citation to the records searched and no affidavit in any case. 26-290 makes no nonexistence claim at all. The handling of 'record does not exist' assertions is unchanged and the score falls slightly. 26-34 is the worst handling of a nonexistence assertion in the archive, because the assertion is definitional. The coordinator certifies that 'after a search for records' the record 'does not exist ... under the name nor any other name reasonably known to the public body', having first narrowed the name to a programme the office says it does not run. No system, custodian, date range or search term is described; no affidavit accompanies the certificate. The certificate is the conclusion of an argument about vocabulary, not the record of a search. The score falls. 26-33 is a better-handled certificate than most: it states the basis (no aggregate record is maintained; producing one would create a new record), defines the population of records it would search, and attaches a denial form whose checked box matches the letter. It still does not describe the search performed. The score rises slightly on the explanation, not on the search description. 26-31 attaches a denial form and names eight responsive records, which is more than a bare 'no record' letter. But it never describes the search performed -- no custodians, no systems, no date range searched -- and does not say whether the list is complete for four of the five requested years. The score edges down on the absent search description.", "score": 13, "status": "sufficient" }, "C4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-195-25-195-responsive-documents-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2018-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-responsive-court-data", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-request", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-request", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-32-memo-25-195", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-292 supplies a specific migration fact: the aggregate 'Charges on Authorized Felony Case Report' was 'generated through the old case tracking system prior to the Prosecutor's Office losing access' to it. That is the clearest statement in the archive of what the migration cost in reporting capability, and it is a disclosure rather than a concealment. It is also an admission that the office cannot reach its own historical data. The score falls slightly. 26-33 contains no statement about historical records or the June 2024 migration, so it neither helps nor harms this indicator. The score holds. 26-31 contains no statement about historical records or the June 2024 migration, so it neither helps nor harms this indicator. The score holds.", "score": 60, "status": "sufficient" }, "C5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-292 adds one fact about capability -- that the old system could generate the monthly authorization report and the current one apparently cannot -- but the office does not say what the current system can report instead. The score holds.", "score": 54, "status": "sufficient" }, "C6": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-trial-table", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No structured data, no export and no machine-readable file was produced in any of the three files. 26-291's table exists only as typeset text in a letter. The score falls slightly.", "score": 25, "status": "sufficient" }, "C7": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-trial-table", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-25-279-request", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-21-request", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-29-request", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-30-request", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-28-request", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-292 names the old case-tracking system as the only source of the report and offers no alternative route to the number, even while saying the number could be calculated from records it holds. 26-290 offers no alternative to the 25-279 production. The score falls slightly.", "score": 47, "status": "sufficient" }, "D1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-196-25-196-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2018-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2019-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2020-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2021-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-PUB-PROSECUTOR", "EV-25-254-produced-records" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-290 and 26-292 both describe records as 'previously provided' to a single requester. Nothing in the batch was published or made available to the public at large. The score falls slightly.", "score": 11, "status": "sufficient" }, "D2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-234-25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts-redacted", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-FOIA", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-PROC" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "The batch does not touch the office's published reports or datasets; there are none for victim-services staffing or felony authorizations. The score holds.", "score": 72, "status": "sufficient" }, "D3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011270-FH-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-judgment-2024-0000011271-FH-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-cane-information-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-complaint-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-murray-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-nolle-prosequi-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-21st-century-report-table1", "EV-25-135-25-135-case-documents-as-released", "EV-25-94-25-94-warrants-2021-2023-redacted", "EV-PUB-PROSECUTOR", "EV-25-244-25-244-responsive-documents", "EV-25-254-produced-records" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-292 confirms that a monthly felony-authorization report existed and was generated by the old system, and that the office no longer publishes or produces it. That is a proactive-disclosure loss, and the score falls slightly.", "score": 9, "status": "sufficient" }, "D4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-PUB-PROSECUTOR", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-290 asserts that records were already given to one requester as the reason for refusing them to the public, which is the opposite of proactive disclosure. The score falls slightly.", "score": 24, "status": "sufficient" }, "D5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-PUB-PROSECUTOR" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No log, index or register of released records is described in any of the three letters. The score falls slightly.", "score": 9, "status": "sufficient" }, "D6": { "evidence_ids": [], "na_rationale": null, "note": "Reviewed again against the full record and still not scorable. The indicator requires three distinct requests in which the office answered by pointing to material it had already published, and the record contains none. The closest item is the 25-129 denial form, which has a field for records 'available on website' and records the answer as 'None' - the office affirmatively stated that nothing responsive was already posted, which is the opposite of the conduct this indicator measures. 25-195 attached published external material (MDOC statistical report excerpts and the PACC Annual Prosecution Survey 2022) to its own budget memos, but that is the office producing published documents as part of a release, not directing a requester to public material that already answered the request. Marking this not applicable would remove its weight from category D and raise the coverage figure without evidence, so it stays partial and unscored until a request in the record actually turns on published material.", "score": null, "status": "partial" }, "E1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-197-denial-form", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-131", "EV-CW-25-132", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-CW-nelson", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-denial-form", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-denial-form" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-291 cites 'MCL 15.243(9)' as the attorney-client exemption. Section 15.243 ends at subsection (4); the exemption is MCL 15.243(1)(g). 26-290 cites no statutory exemption at all, resting the withholding on Densmore v Department of Corrections, a 1994 Court of Appeals decision, which is not an exemption under section 13 and does not displace the statute's own test that the records have actually been published or made available. 26-292 cites no exemption. Citation accuracy is the core of this indicator and it falls sharply. 26-33 cites MCL 15.233(4) -- the correct provision for declining to create a new record -- and does not misstate a subsection. That is a clean citation in a batch where the sibling letters garbled theirs. The score rises slightly. 26-31 invokes Densmore v Department of Corrections, 203 Mich 363 (1994), a judicial decision on duplicative requests, but files it under section 13 of the FOIA with the subsection left blank. Densmore is not a section 13 exemption, so the citation and the form do not match. The score edges down on the mislabelled authority.", "score": 47, "status": "sufficient" }, "E2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-197-denial-form", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-141-26-141-responsive-documents", "EV-26-143-26-143-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-30-densmore", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-34-denial-form", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-eight-record-list", "EV-26-31-prior-production-absent" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-291 both asserts the attorney-client privilege and denies that it ever attached -- 'not deemed privileged as they were provided to the Board of Commissioners not in the Delta County Prosecutor's capacity as civil counsel' -- within four paragraphs. 26-290 explains Densmore in general terms but never says which record is covered by which part of the earlier production. No explanation in the batch identifies the exempt material with the specificity the statute contemplates. The score falls. 26-34 cites no exemption. The Denial Form's 'Exempt from Disclosure' box is unmarked and the 'Section 13, Subsection ___' line is blank, and the letter's authority is the Juvenile Diversion Act, MCL 722.821 et seq. -- a records-custody and confidentiality provision governing Probate Court files, not a FOIA exemption applied to a record the prosecutor holds. The explanation offered is of why the office does not hold the record, not of why an exemption covers it. The score falls. 26-33 explains why the exemption-like ground fits: no record currently documents an aggregate, and producing one would require creating a new record, which the Act does not compel. The explanation is specific to the material and consistent with the grant of the underlying data. The score rises. 26-31's stated ground is duplicativeness plus the requester's failure to show 'justification or need.' The Act does not require a requester to justify need -- MCL 15.233(1) governs the description of the record, not the reason for wanting it -- and the letter does not explain how Densmore applies to a request for an aggregate that was never produced. The score edges down.", "score": 26, "status": "sufficient" }, "E3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-197-denial-form", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-denial-forms-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-132", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-denial-form", "EV-26-21-denial-form", "EV-26-29-denial-form", "EV-26-30-denial-form", "EV-26-28-denial-form", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-32-denial", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-denial-form", "EV-26-31-denial-form" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No Notice of Denial form accompanies any of the three letters, although 26-290 withholds five items and 26-292 withholds the entire request. The statutory notice requirement is not met in form or in substance. The score falls. 26-33 attaches a complete Notice of Denial: box 2 checked, boxes 1 and 3 unmarked, date received matching the letter, and the appeal notice present. The form agrees with the disposition stated in the letter. This is the cleanest denial form in the recent batch and the score rises. 26-31 attaches a Notice of Denial, but the checked box (1, section 13) does not fit the actual ground (duplicative under Densmore) and the subsection line is blank. The form is present but does not accurately record the disposition. The score edges down.", "score": 20, "status": "sufficient" }, "E4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-appeal-form", "EV-25-134-25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-appeal-form", "EV-25-135-25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-200-25-200-appeal-form-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-denial-forms-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-denial-form", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-denial-form", "EV-25-279-denial-form", "EV-26-21-denial-form", "EV-26-29-denial-form", "EV-26-29-fee-appeal", "EV-26-30-denial-form", "EV-26-28-denial-form", "EV-26-28-fee-appeal", "EV-26-32-denial", "EV-26-32-appeal-25-278", "EV-26-33-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "All three letters reproduce the MCL 15.240 appeal paragraph and the deltacountymi.gov address in the standard footer, including the reference to punitive damages of $1,000.00. That is the one element of the denial process that is consistently present. The score holds. 26-33 reproduces the MCL 15.240 appeal paragraph and encloses the statutory excerpt and a blank Denial Appeal Form. No appeal was taken, so handling and timeliness are not tested. The score holds, edging up on the enclosure of the appeal form.", "score": 37, "status": "sufficient" }, "E5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-197-kobasic-settlement", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-karpel-contradiction", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-130", "EV-CW-25-130-lab", "EV-CW-25-131", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-CW-25-268", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-denial-form", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-denial-form", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-unmeasured-premise", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-30-densmore", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-32-memo-25-94", "EV-26-32-memo-25-195", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-33-sibling-contrast", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-denial-form", "EV-26-31-prior-production-absent" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "Consistency falls again. 26-290 refuses five items on the ground that they were already produced in 25-279, a production that contains no responsive documents and instead demanded $17,336.89 in deposits. 26-292 refuses an aggregate by citing two earlier productions, 25-94 and 25-195, that this archive does not describe as containing the report at all. 26-291 answers a privilege-log request with a list of produced documents and then says nothing was privileged. The same office, in the same three-day batch, gives three incompatible accounts of what it has already given the requester. The score falls to the floor. 26-34 is the sharpest consistency failure yet, and it is internal to a single fax transmission. 26-34 and 26-35 arrived together at 1:18 and 2:05 p.m. on February 9, 2026, were clarified by the same 1:22 p.m. e-mail, and were answered on the same day by the same coordinator. 26-35 was granted in full, with a count of 52 pleas produced in 85 minutes at no charge, and the office volunteered that its own number was over-inclusive rather than redefining 'plea'. 26-34 was denied outright because the office redefined 'diversion'. The same office, answering the same afternoon's faxes, treats one word as fixed and the other as negotiable. The score is already at its floor and cannot fall further; the note records why. 26-33 and its sibling 26-34, faxed two minutes apart and answered the same day by the same coordinator, describe the same statutory landscape differently: 26-33 names four deferral provisions and prices a search for them, while 26-34 says no diversion programme other than juvenile diversion exists in Delta County. Each is defensible on its own vocabulary, but the pair leaves the public unable to tell whether deferred-sentence cases exist. Consistency falls. 26-31 relies on FOIA 25-267, a prior production this archive cannot locate, and none of the eight named documents appears among its published PDFs; the MSP number 80-03-24 matches neither of the incident numbers in the 25-241 special-prosecutor production. The denial form's section 13 box also contradicts the Densmore ground in the letter. Consistency falls to the floor.", "score": 2, "status": "sufficient" }, "E6": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-produced-records", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-25-279-grant-without-enclosure", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-290 withholds all five substantive items in full without identifying any segregable portion. 26-291 releases a list while denying the underlying records and gives no count. 26-292 declines the whole request. No letter describes a segregation analysis. The score falls.", "score": 30, "status": "sufficient" }, "E7": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-appeal-form", "EV-25-134-25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-appeal-form", "EV-25-135-25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-29-fee-appeal", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-fee-appeal", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-32-appeal-25-278" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No fee was quoted in any of the three, so no fee challenge arises and the appeal paragraph is present. The score holds.", "score": 56, "status": "sufficient" }, "F1": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-196-25-196-request-redacted", "EV-25-197-denial-form", "EV-25-197-kobasic-filings", "EV-25-197-kobasic-settlement", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-forms-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-140-26-140-143-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-257-certificate-versus-availability", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-25-279-grant-without-enclosure", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-response", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-35-fax", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-34-response", "EV-26-34-fax", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-itemization", "EV-26-31-response", "EV-26-31-eight-record-list" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "26-291's central citation is to a statutory subsection that does not exist, and its privilege position reverses itself mid-letter. 26-290 says 'granted' five times while withholding everything. 26-292 quotes the requester's scope limitation correctly and then reads it as its opposite. Clarity and accuracy both suffer, and the score falls. 26-34 carries three receipt dates for one fax -- February 9 on the request form and the IPFone log, February 10 on the Denial Form, February 17 in the letter -- and the letter's own opening sentence says the request was 'dated February 10, 2026, and received ... on February 17, 2026', which is the date of the response. The office's forwarded e-mail of February 9 at 1:22 p.m. says the two requests 'just came in'. The response is timely on every reading, so the error does not prejudice the requester here; what it damages is the reliability of the office's written account of its own record. The score falls. 26-33 is clear and internally consistent: the dates agree across the letter, the denial form and the itemization, and the disposition is stated plainly. It is held down by the $4.13 arithmetic slip in the itemization and by the unresolved tension with its sibling letter. The score edges up on clarity. 26-31 is plainly written and timely, and its dates reconcile. It is held down by the mismatch between the letter's Densmore ground and the form's section 13 box, by the unstated completeness of a list that covers only 2024, and by the added 'justification or need' condition. The score edges down on clarity of basis.", "score": 18, "status": "sufficient" }, "F2": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-28-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "All three letters identify the FOIA Coordinator by name and give the office address and telephone number in the footer, and none required clarification from the requester. The score holds.", "score": 67, "status": "sufficient" }, "F3": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-129-25-129-board-denial-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-130-25-130-response-redacted", "EV-25-131-25-131-response-redacted", "EV-25-132-25-132-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-denial-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-supplemental-denial-2025-09-02-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-134-25-134-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-extension-notice-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-notice-of-denial-redacted", "EV-25-135-25-135-response-2025-07-17-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-extension-redacted", "EV-25-136-25-136-response-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-extension-form-redacted", "EV-25-137-25-137-response-redacted", "EV-25-139-25-139-response-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-denial-form-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-196-25-196-fy2023-audit", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-25-200-25-200-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-response-redacted", "EV-25-234-25-234-responsive-lab-reports", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-responsive-documents", "EV-25-241-25-241-responsive-documents-redacted", "EV-25-94-25-94-response-redacted", "EV-26-142-26-142-responsive-documents", "EV-26-143-26-143-responsive-documents", "EV-26-20-26-20-response-redacted", "EV-26-22-26-22-response-redacted", "EV-CW-25-130-lab", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-produced-records", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-279-response", "EV-26-21-response", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-29-response", "EV-26-30-response", "EV-26-30-densmore", "EV-26-28-response", "EV-26-32-email-thread", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "The batch frames compliance as discretionary in three ways: 26-290 substitutes a court decision for the statute's own publication test; 26-292 offers to grant the request 'should you wish to clarify,' placing the burden of the office's own scope reading on the requester; and all three omit any waiver determination. The score falls slightly.", "score": 28, "status": "sufficient" }, "F4": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-194-25-194-response-redacted", "EV-25-195-25-195-response-redacted", "EV-25-199-25-199-responsive-redacted", "EV-CW-25-199", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-279-grant-without-enclosure", "EV-26-21-amended", "EV-26-21-amendment-arithmetic", "EV-26-30-densmore", "EV-26-34-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No letter in the batch acknowledges or corrects any of its own errors -- the miscited subsection, the reversed privilege position, the reliance on a production that contained nothing -- and no correction has been issued. The score falls slightly. 26-34 adds a second uncorrected date error to the same eight-day window: the February 17 letter states a receipt date its own enclosed fax log and forwarded e-mail contradict, and no correction or explanation has been issued. The office also had the requester's clarification in hand on February 9 and still dated the request February 10. The score falls.", "score": 6, "status": "sufficient" }, "F5": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-118-25-118-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-129-25-129-response-redacted", "EV-25-133-25-133-cost-itemization-2025-09-02", "EV-25-180-25-180-request-redacted", "EV-25-180-25-180-response-redacted", "EV-25-197-request", "EV-25-197-response", "EV-25-199-25-199-response-redacted", "EV-25-201-25-201-contract-and-invoices", "EV-25-202-25-202-response-redacted", "EV-25-239-25-239-response-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-request-redacted", "EV-25-240-25-240-response-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-request-redacted", "EV-25-241-25-241-response-redacted", "EV-25-244-25-244-fee-itemization-redacted", "EV-26-131-26-131-cost-itemization", "EV-26-131-26-131-request-letter", "EV-26-131-26-131-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-response-redacted", "EV-26-136-26-136-responsive-documents", "EV-26-22-26-22-itemization-and-fax-redacted", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-FOIA", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-PROC", "EV-25-215-25-215-response-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted", "EV-25-215-25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted", "EV-25-257-response", "EV-25-257-fee-itemization", "EV-25-257-request", "EV-25-254-response", "EV-25-254-fee-itemization", "EV-25-254-reused-itemization", "EV-25-254-arithmetic", "EV-25-254-request", "EV-25-277-fee-itemization", "EV-25-277-response", "EV-25-278-response", "EV-25-278-fee-itemization", "EV-25-278-double-invoice", "EV-25-279-fee-itemizations", "EV-25-279-request", "EV-26-21-fee-itemization", "EV-26-21-request", "EV-26-29-fee-itemization", "EV-26-29-request", "EV-26-30-request", "EV-26-28-fee-itemization", "EV-26-28-request", "EV-26-32-request", "EV-26-32-memo-25-278", "EV-26-35-response", "EV-26-35-request", "EV-26-290-response", "EV-26-291-response", "EV-26-292-response", "EV-26-33-response", "EV-26-33-itemization", "EV-26-31-response" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "No fee, no estimate and no waiver determination in any of the three. On 26-292 the office says the records could be provided and quotes nothing, which leaves the requester unable to decide whether to proceed. The score falls slightly. 26-33 explains its costs in detail, states the appeal right, and invites clarification that could narrow or correct the request. It does not decide the public-interest waiver, and it offers no less-costly alternative to the full 4,400-file search. The score rises on the cost explanation, held down by the undecided waiver. 26-31 explains that the records were previously produced and invites no clarification; it offers no path to the aggregate the requester actually sought and does not explain how to obtain the prior 25-267 production. The score edges down on constructive assistance.", "score": 15, "status": "sufficient" }, "F6": { "evidence_ids": [ "EV-25-234-25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts-redacted", "EV-PUB-COUNTY-FOIA", "EV-PUB-PROSECUTOR", "EV-26-35-request" ], "na_rationale": null, "note": "The batch adds nothing to the office's published FOIA instructions, forms or accessibility. The score holds.", "score": 68, "status": "sufficient" } }, "last_updated": "2026-11-02", "methodology_version": "1.2.0", "reassessment_queue": [ { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score adjusted to 36.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score adjusted to 27.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score adjusted to 38.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score adjusted to 36.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180", "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score adjusted to 35.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-180" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-239/25-239-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-239" ], "resolution": "Reviewed against the 25-180 and 25-239 evidence; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-240/25-240-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-240" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-240 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-240-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new request", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-268", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new request", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-268", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new request", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-268", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new request", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-268", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-fax-and-notices-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-filings.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-kobasic-settlement.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-197/25-197-roberts-filings.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-197" ], "resolution": "Reviewed the 25-197 packet and recorded evidence records EV-25-197-*.", "resolved": "2026-10-25", "resolved_date": "2026-10-25", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-135", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-135", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-135", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-135", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-244", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-244 (October 30, 2025 response) and the six released documents; score and note updated where the record supported a change.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-responsive-documents.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-131/26-131-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-131" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against the 26-131 evidence and the existing record; score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-140", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed the 25-194 and 25-195 response letters and extension forms. Both requests were dated August 13, 2025, received August 14, 2025, and answered September 3, 2025. Counting from receipt, that is 20 calendar days, inside the five-business-day window only because the office used the voluminous-request extension; both extension forms check the volume box. Timing is compliant on both, so the timing evidence does not move the score. A1 unchanged at 67.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-140", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed both response letters against MCL 15.235(5). Each names a contact, states a disposition and lists exemptions. The 25-194 letter is internally inconsistent on disposition (page 2 says denied to the extent exempt, page 3 says granted subject to exemptions) and never maps its 13 cited exemptions to the four categories of records requested, and it does not answer the requester's offer to accept a log. 25-195 does identify the withheld category and certifies nonexistence of others. Mixed, as already scored. A3 unchanged at 41.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed both Detailed Cost Itemizations dated 09/03/2025. 25-194: 43,200 minutes locate / 15 = 2,880 increments at $6.21 = $17,870.40, plus 2,880 increments at $15.68 = $45,158.40, subtotal $63,028.80, 50% deposit $31,514.40. 25-195: 480 increments at $6.21 twice = $5,961.60, deposit $2,980.80. Both itemize by line and both charge a deposit, which supports the existing score; but 25-194 charges the same 2,880 increments twice (locate and redact) at different rates on a request offered to be narrowed to a log. A4 unchanged at 52.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed the estimate-and-deposit sequence on both records. Both estimates are dated the same day as the response letter (09/03/2025) and both demand a 50% deposit before any work, with a stated 270-day production window. No record shows the deposit was paid or that any work began. That pattern is consistent with the existing 38. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-142/26-142-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-140", "26-141", "26-142", "26-143", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed what was actually produced. 25-194 produced zero pages and zero documents against roughly 14,400 email conversations, 50 text conversations and 1,700 case files. 25-195 produced 10 documents and 71 pages. The zero-production outcome on 25-194 is already the anchor for B1's 40; the 25-195 production is a partial offset that does not raise the score. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-142/26-142-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-141", "26-142", "26-143", "25-241", "25-133", "25-135", "25-94", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed usability of the 25-195 production. The 71 pages are readable, dated and internally identifiable: two budget memos with attachments, two drafts, and four Adult Case Tracking reports run 11/30/2023. They are usable, which is why B2 sits at 44 rather than lower, but 25-194 produced nothing to assess. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-142/26-142-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-141", "26-142", "26-143", "25-241", "25-133", "25-135", "25-180", "25-94", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed segregation and redaction. 25-194 cites 13 exemptions across four record categories without segregating or producing any nonexempt portion, despite the requester's MCL 15.244 request. 25-195 withholds one category wholesale on privilege and produces the rest. Wholesale withholding without segregation is already reflected in B3's 34. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed unexplained gaps and internal consistency. Two new gaps are documented: 25-194's letter contradicts itself on disposition within the same document, and 25-195 produced four Adult Case Tracking reports containing case counts while FOIA 25-134, 25-136 and 25-137 were each certified as having no such records. That cross-request inconsistency is the strongest evidence yet for B4, which already sits at the low anchor of 18. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-142/26-142-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-141", "26-142", "26-143", "25-241", "25-133", "25-135", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed search scope and withheld-material disclosure. Neither letter describes what was searched, which custodians or systems were queried, or how the volume figures were derived. 25-194 asserts ~14,400 email conversations and ~1,700 case files without describing the search; 25-195 withholds a category on privilege without identifying the documents withheld. B5 unchanged at 31.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-142/26-142-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "new request", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-141", "26-142", "26-143", "aker-horvath", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed availability of existing aggregate data. 25-195 is the clearest positive in the file: four Adult Case Tracking reports for 2023 (misdemeanor and felony charges, warrants by agency) were produced on request, showing the office can generate aggregate case data. It is also the clearest negative: the same office certified in 25-134, 25-136 and 25-137 that it had no such statistics. C1 already captures both sides at 44. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed the cost of obtaining existing data. 25-195 prices four pre-existing system reports at $5,961.60, and 25-194 prices a log the requester offered to accept at $63,028.80. Both charge search-and-review labor for records that already exist in the office's systems. C2 unchanged at 30.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new request", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "aker-horvath", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed 'record does not exist' certifications. 25-195 certifies that performance reviews, employee evaluations and operational assessments do not exist, while producing budget memos that describe staffing, caseload and performance metrics. The certificate is narrower than the request and is not reconciled with the produced material. C3 unchanged at 24.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-180", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed structured data and export capability. The four Adult Case Tracking reports were produced as fixed reports, not as data extracts; the requester asked for records, and the office supplied printouts. No record shows the office will export a machine-readable dataset. C6 unchanged at 39.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed retrieval limitations and alternative sources. 25-194 offers no alternative to a $63,028.80 full production even though the requester proposed a log; 25-195 produces fixed reports but does not point to any other source for the withheld category. C7 unchanged at 35.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-180" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed disclosure about data systems. Nothing in either new record describes the case-management system, its migration history or its data dictionary. D4 unchanged at 18.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "new request", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-137", "26-139", "26-140", "26-141", "26-143", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed statutory basis cited. 25-194 cites 13 exemptions, including MCL 15.243(1)(a), (b)(i)-(vi), (c), (d), (f), (g), (h), (s)(i)-(x), (u), (w) and (z), and cites Messenger v Ingham County Prosecutor, 232 Mich App 633 (1998), for work product. 25-195 cites MCL 15.243(1)(g). Statutory bases are named, which supports E1's 52; the problem is application, not citation. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "new request", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-137", "26-139", "26-140", "26-141", "26-143", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed explanation of how the exemption applies. 25-194 lists 13 exemptions as a block without mapping any of them to a specific category of record or explaining how each applies to emails, texts, attorney correspondence or media correspondence. 25-195 invokes attorney-client privilege for 'reports provided to or prepared for county officials' while producing two budget memos addressed to the Board of County Commissioners. E2 unchanged at 31.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed completeness of the Notice of Denial. 25-194's form checks 'Exempt from Disclosure' and 'Redaction' with 'see attachment' and names Emily DeSalvo. 25-195's form checks 'Exempt', 'Record Does Not Exist' and 'Redaction' on one form for one request. Both are complete as forms; the substantive gaps are captured in E1 and E2. E3 unchanged at 35.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-141/26-141-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/26-143/26-143-responsive-documents.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "new request", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-137", "26-139", "26-140", "26-141", "26-143", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed consistency across similar requests. 25-195 is a direct inconsistency: the office produced 2023 case-tracking reports here while certifying in 25-134, 25-136 and 25-137 that comparable case statistics did not exist. It also withheld 'reports provided to county officials' on privilege while producing two memos to the Board of Commissioners. E5 already sits at 18; the new record reinforces rather than changes it. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-140/26-140-143-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "26-140", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed clarity and accuracy of written communications. Two concrete accuracy defects are now on the record: 25-194's letter states two different dispositions on consecutive pages, and 25-195's privilege withholding is contradicted by its own production of two Board of Commissioners memos. F1 unchanged at 43.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)", "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "26-136", "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed cost and options communication. 25-194 quotes $63,028.80 and a $31,514.40 deposit without offering the narrowed log the requester proposed, which would have been far cheaper; 25-195 quotes $5,961.60 and $2,980.80. Neither letter explains that a narrower request would reduce the estimate. F5 unchanged at 29.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-241/25-241-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "partial", "reasons": [ "new document", "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-241", "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scored from partial to sufficient, 40. Four requests now support the indicator (25-201, 25-239, 25-244, 25-195). 25-195 adds direct proof that pre-2024 system output survived: four Adult Case Tracking reports run 11/30/2023 were still retrievable and producible in a 2025 release, and 25-239 reaches back to December 2017 while 25-244 admits a migration gap. That documents retrievability, which is enough to score. It does not document what was migrated, where pre-2024 records are held, what exports exist, or what search was performed, so it sits at the bottom of the 40-59 band.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed both extension forms. 25-194 and 25-195 each have a Notice to Extend Response Time form with the voluminous-request box checked and a contact name (Emily DeSalvo) supplied. Neither form states a new due date in legible handwriting, and the 25-195 form's handwritten values are internally contradictory, so the record shows an extension was claimed but not that a specific extended deadline was communicated. That is already reflected in A2's 46. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed disposition and outstanding actions. Neither letter closes the request cleanly: 25-194 leaves the disposition self-contradictory and does not respond to the offer to accept a log instead of full correspondence; 25-195 grants in part, denies one category on attorney-client privilege and certifies another nonexistent, but does not explain why two budget memos to the Board of Commissioners were produced while 'reports provided to county officials' were withheld. A6 unchanged at 47.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-133", "25-135", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed proactive release of frequently requested records. The 2023 case-tracking reports produced in 25-195 are exactly the kind of record that recurs across requests (25-129, 25-133, 25-134, 25-135, 25-136, 25-137 all sought case data) and none is posted. D3 unchanged at 10.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-137/25-137-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-139/25-139-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-137", "25-139", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed appeal notice, handling and timeliness. Both packets include the MCL 15.240 excerpt, the office's written FOIA policy and a blank appeal form, so the appeal path is noticed. No appeal is on file for either request. E4 unchanged at 40.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed denial rates and nonexempt-portion consideration. 25-194 denies in full with no nonexempt portion produced; 25-195 denies one category and produces the rest. Neither considers partial release of the withheld category. E6 unchanged at 36.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed fee challenges and appeal outcomes. Both records quote fees and demand deposits; neither shows a fee challenge, waiver grant or appeal outcome. No fee waiver was granted on either, consistent with the standing record that waivers are requested and refused. E7 unchanged at 55.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed identified contacts and clarification. Both letters and both denial forms name Emily DeSalvo with a direct telephone number (906-789-5100), and the letters carry the office address and main line. Neither letter offers clarification of an ambiguous request. F2 unchanged at 66.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-129/25-129-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-133/25-133-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-134/25-134-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-135/25-135-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-136/25-136-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-180/25-180-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-94/25-94-board-appeal-decision-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-129", "25-133", "25-134", "25-135", "25-136", "25-180", "25-94", "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed consistency between public statements and records. 25-195's FY 2024-25 budget memo states the office can provide 'final review of any complex FOIA requests' as a funded service, and the same office produced four case-tracking reports it had elsewhere certified did not exist. F3 unchanged at 35.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed documentation of system capability. The 25-195 production is itself a demonstration of capability: the office can run charge and warrant reports by date range and by agency. No document describes the case-management system, its fields, its export formats or its retention rules. Demonstrated capability without documented capability is what C5's 50 already measures. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed published statistics and reports. 25-195 confirms the office holds 2023 charge and warrant statistics in report form but publishes none of them; the requester had to file a FOIA and pay a $5,961.60 estimate to see four reports. That is direct evidence for D1's existing low score of 12. Unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-194/25-194-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-denial-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-fee-itemization-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-195/25-195-responsive-documents-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-194", "25-195" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scored from partial to sufficient, 12. Two documented errors, neither corrected: the 25-194 letter contradicts itself on disposition and never maps its 13 exemptions to the four categories requested or answers the offer to accept a log; the 25-195 privilege withholding is contradicted by two produced memos to the Board of County Commissioners. That is the 0-19 anchor. Set at 12 rather than lower because both requests were answered on time and in writing.", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2018-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2019-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2020-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2021-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-fy2023-audit.pdf", "assets/documents/25-196/25-196-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-196" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-196 (five county financial statements, FY2022 and FY2024 absent, no cover letter).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-appeal-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-extension-form-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-fax-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-200/25-200-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-25", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-200" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed against FOIA 25-200 (software and systems inventory, answered September 8, 2025).", "resolved": "2026-10-25" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: request logged 2025-08-19, extension noticed the same day to 2025-09-08, answered on the extended date. Timing compliant; the extension is what made the answer timely.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: Notice to Extend Response Time dated 2025-08-19 states a specific extended date of 2025-09-08 and checks the voluminous-records reason. A proper, dated extension.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the letter states the request, the disposition, the certificate of nonexistence, the exemptions relied on for redaction and the appeal route. It refers to an attached fee itemization that is not in the packet, so the response is incomplete on cost.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: no fee was quantified. The letter asserts a charge and points to an 'attached FOIA Fee Itemization' that does not exist in the twenty-five-page packet. No rate, hours, deposit or total stated.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: no estimate and no deposit timeline exist because no amount was ever stated. The grant is conditioned on an unstated payment, which leaves the requester nothing to accept, narrow against, or appeal.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: thirteen pages of responsive emails produced against an estimated 500 conversations. The communications grant is real but the bulk of the set was never produced because the fee was never stated.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the cost of the records was asserted but never quantified, so the requester could not evaluate the cost of obtaining them. The only dollar figures in the packet are the vendors' own estimates inside the produced emails.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the office certified that no RFP, vendor bid or purchase order exists 'under the name nor any other name reasonably known to the public body,' and simultaneously produced emails showing PAAM ran the procurement. The certificate is narrow and literal.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the produced emails establish that PAAM administered the procurement and that Karpel won 52 of 66 county votes in March 2023. No implementation date is asserted; the record does not supply one.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the thirteen pages were produced as a scanned or flattened packet, not as structured data. No machine-readable export accompanies the production.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the office states that roughly 500 email conversations exist and were not produced pending an unstated fee, and does not describe how the search was run or which custodians were searched.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the office states that the procurement and implementation of ProsecutorByKarpel were administered by PAAM, which is a documented statement about who ran the acquisition, but supplies no contract, license count or county cost share.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the Notice of Denial cites MCL 15.243(1)(a) and (1)(iii) for redaction, and the letter cites the FOIA act generally for the certificate of nonexistence. The nonexistence holding is not tied to a specific statutory subsection.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the redaction exemptions are named by subsection but not explained as applied to any specific withheld item. The nonexistence holding is explained by reference to PAAM's administration of the procurement.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the Notice of Denial checks box 3 (Redaction) and leaves box 2 (Record Does Not Exist) blank, so the form does not record the certificate of nonexistence that the letter relies on. The notice is internally inconsistent.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the packet includes the MCL 15.240 excerpt and the county appeal form, so appeal rights are noticed. No appeal was filed on either the certificate or the unstated fee.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the office's treatment of procurement records is consistent with 25-200, which named Karpel as the office's system without producing any procurement document. Both responses place the acquisition outside the county's file.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the office answered within the extended period and produced thirteen pages without payment, but conditioned the remainder on a fee it never stated.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-denial-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-202/25-202-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-202" ], "resolution_note": "25-202: the response is internally inconsistent — a certificate of nonexistence in the letter and a redaction box on the form — which is a documentation failure rather than an evasion.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-199/25-199-responsive-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-199" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 25-199 (case watch): response packet and responsive documents added; status and score retained.", "resolved": "2026-10-26" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 70 to 64.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 32 to 30.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 22 to 26.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 26 to 32.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 48 to 44.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-268" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 58.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 33.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 22.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 34 to 30.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 18 to 14.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 14 to 18.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 36 to 32.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 50.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-254", "25-257" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 30.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-254", "25-257" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 34.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with the full archive including 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 53.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 28 to 26.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 18 to 20.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 40 to 34.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 8.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 26 to 30.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-fee-itemizations-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-215/25-215-responsive-court-data.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-denial-and-appeal-forms-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-law-and-policy-excerpts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-request-and-receipt-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-234/25-234-responsive-lab-reports.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-request-and-fax-receipts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-277/25-277-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-26", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-215", "25-234", "25-254", "25-257", "25-268", "25-277" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score moved 22 to 20.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254", "25-257" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 48.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254", "25-268" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 40.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-complaint-and-texts.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-court-order.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-msp-investigation.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-ag-correspondence.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-sheriff-memos.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254", "25-257", "25-268" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 8.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with the full archive including 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with the full archive including 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 36.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 35.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-254" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed with 25-277 (December 18, 2025 response); score unchanged at 8.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-fee-itemization-and-extension.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/25-278/25-278-responsive-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-278" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-278 packet and the six new EV-25-278 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 25-279 packet and the six new EV-25-279 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279" ], "resolution": "Flag cleared during the 26-29/26-30 review. The 25-279 documents were re-hashed by the evidence scan; the indicator was checked against the existing 25-279 evidence records and the prior score was confirmed unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-extension-notice.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-fee-itemizations.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-request-and-fax-receipt.pdf", "assets/documents/25-279/25-279-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-amended-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-21/26-21-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "25-279", "26-21" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-21 packet, both letters, and the six new EV-26-21 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-29/26-29-response-letter.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-30/26-30-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-29", "26-30" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-29 and 26-30 packets and the nine new EV-26-29 / EV-26-30 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-appeal-form-and-policies.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-fee-itemization.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-28/26-28-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-28" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-28 packet and the five new EV-26-28 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-appeal-25-278.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-denial-form-and-authorities.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-email-thread.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-195.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-278-with-attachments.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-memo-25-94.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-request-and-fax-record.pdf", "assets/documents/26-32/26-32-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-10-30", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution": "Re-reviewed against the 26-32 packet and the eight new EV-26-32 evidence records; the indicator note was rewritten and the score confirmed or adjusted.", "resolved": "2026-10-30", "resolved_date": "2026-10-30", "status": "resolved" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-291", "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "D3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "D4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "26-136", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-268", "26-32", "26-34" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E7", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "26-32" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-reviewed against the FOIA 26-34 packet (response letter, Denial Form, IPFone fax log and the February 9 forwarded e-mail) and the three new EV-26-34 evidence records; the indicator note was extended and the score reviewed.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/25-244/25-244-request-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/25-268/25-268-denial-and-appeal-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-136/26-136-response-redacted.pdf", "assets/documents/26-290/26-290-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-291/26-291-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-292/26-292-response.pdf", "assets/documents/26-34/26-34-response-and-denial-forms.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "document changed", "new document", "request record updated (status, fees or appeal)" ], "request_ids": [ "25-244", "25-268", "26-136", "26-290", "26-291", "26-292", "26-32", "26-34", "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-fax-notification.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-request-as-received.pdf", "assets/documents/26-35/26-35-response-letter.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F6", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-35" ], "resolution_note": "Re-scanned against the FOIA 26-34 packet; the definitional denial and the receipt-date discrepancy do not bear on this indicator's evidence base, so the note and score are unchanged.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "A5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "B1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "C4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E2", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E3", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E4", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "E5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F1", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-33/26-33-response-and-fee-itemization.pdf" ], "flagged": "2026-11-02", "indicator": "F5", "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-33" ], "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-33 response, denial form and fee itemization (EV-26-33-response, EV-26-33-itemization, EV-26-33-denial-form, EV-26-33-sibling-contrast); indicator note and score updated.", "resolved": "2026-11-02" }, { "indicator": "A1", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "A3", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "A4", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "A5", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "B1", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "C1", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "C2", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "C3", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "C4", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "E1", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "E2", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "E3", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "E5", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "F1", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." }, { "indicator": "F5", "flagged": "2026-11-02", "resolved": "2026-11-02", "reasons": [ "new document" ], "request_ids": [ "26-31" ], "documents": [ "assets/documents/26-31/26-31-response-and-denial.pdf" ], "prior_status_retained": "sufficient", "resolution_note": "Reviewed FOIA 26-31 (prosecutor attendance at crime scenes): timely 3-business-day denial that answered a request for aggregate numerical data with an eight-item inventory of withheld documents, cited Densmore as a duplicative ground under a section 13 box with a blank subsection, and added a 'justification or need' condition the Act does not state. Indicator re-scored and noted accordingly." } ], "result": { "status": "definitive", "status_label": "Definitive", "score": 33.5185, "score_display": 34, "band": "Low Transparency", "overall_coverage": 98.8, "categories_assessed": 6, "missing_categories": [], "assessed_weight": 100.0, "normalization_applied": false, "distinct_foias_cited": 53, "relevant_requests_available": 55, "foia_requests_indexed": 50, "case_watches_indexed": 7, "definitive_checks": [ { "key": "overall_coverage", "label": "Overall evidence coverage", "required": 80, "actual": 98.8, "met": true }, { "key": "categories_assessed", "label": "Categories sufficiently assessed", "required": 4, "actual": 6, "met": true }, { "key": "coverage_C", "label": "Evidence coverage, category C", "required": 70, "actual": 100.0, "met": true }, { "key": "coverage_E", "label": "Evidence coverage, category E", "required": 70, "actual": 100.0, "met": true }, { "key": "distinct_foias", "label": "Distinct FOIA requests cited (required once 20 or more relevant requests exist)", "required": 20, "actual": 53, "met": true }, { "key": "documented_period", "label": "Assessment period, evidence cutoff and methodology version documented", "required": true, "actual": true, "met": true } ], "categories": [ { "id": "A", "name": "FOIA Responsiveness and Procedural Compliance", "weight": 10.0, "coverage": 100.0, "assessed": true, "score": 46.62, "indicators": [ { "id": "A1", "name": "Response timing", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 2.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 77.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "A2", "name": "Use of the extension", "internal_weight": 12.0, "overall_weight": 1.2, "status": "sufficient", "score": 58.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "A3", "name": "Required content of the response", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 1.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 45.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "A4", "name": "Fee itemization and deposits", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 1.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 24.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "A5", "name": "Fee estimate and deposit timeline", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 1.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 28.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "A6", "name": "Disposition, clarification and outstanding actions", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 1.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 44.0, "applicable": true } ] }, { "id": "B", "name": "Record Accessibility and Completeness", "weight": 20.0, "coverage": 100.0, "assessed": true, "score": 34.1, "indicators": [ { "id": "B1", "name": "Responsive records produced", "internal_weight": 28.0, "overall_weight": 5.6, "status": "sufficient", "score": 35.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "B2", "name": "Usability of the records produced", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 3.6, "status": "sufficient", "score": 60.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "B3", "name": "Segregation and redaction", "internal_weight": 24.0, "overall_weight": 4.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 33.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "B4", "name": "Unexplained gaps and internal consistency", "internal_weight": 16.0, "overall_weight": 3.2, "status": "sufficient", "score": 6.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "B5", "name": "Search scope and withheld-material disclosure", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 2.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 33.0, "applicable": true } ] }, { "id": "C", "name": "Existing Data Availability and Accessibility", "weight": 30.0, "coverage": 100.0, "assessed": true, "score": 32.88, "indicators": [ { "id": "C1", "name": "Availability of existing aggregate data", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 6.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 30.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C2", "name": "Cost of obtaining existing data", "internal_weight": 16.0, "overall_weight": 4.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 8.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C3", "name": "Handling of 'record does not exist' certifications", "internal_weight": 16.0, "overall_weight": 4.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 13.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C4", "name": "Historical records and system migration transparency", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 6.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 60.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C5", "name": "Documentation of system capability", "internal_weight": 8.0, "overall_weight": 2.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 54.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C6", "name": "Structured data and export capability", "internal_weight": 10.0, "overall_weight": 3.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 25.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "C7", "name": "Retrieval limitations and alternative sources", "internal_weight": 10.0, "overall_weight": 3.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 47.0, "applicable": true } ] }, { "id": "D", "name": "Proactive Disclosure", "weight": 10.0, "coverage": 88.0, "assessed": true, "score": 26.2045, "indicators": [ { "id": "D1", "name": "Published statistics and reports", "internal_weight": 22.0, "overall_weight": 2.2, "status": "sufficient", "score": 11.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "D2", "name": "Published FOIA procedures, forms and fee policy", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 2.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 72.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "D3", "name": "Proactive release of frequently requested records", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 1.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 9.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "D4", "name": "Disclosure about data systems", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 1.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 24.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "D5", "name": "Machine-readable datasets and downloadable archive", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 1.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 9.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "D6", "name": "Requests for already-published information", "internal_weight": 12.0, "overall_weight": 1.2, "status": "partial", "score": null, "applicable": true } ] }, { "id": "E", "name": "Denial Justification and Appeals Accountability", "weight": 20.0, "coverage": 100.0, "assessed": true, "score": 31.9, "indicators": [ { "id": "E1", "name": "Statutory basis cited", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 4.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 47.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E2", "name": "Explanation of how the exemption applies", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 4.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 26.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E3", "name": "Completeness of the Notice of Denial", "internal_weight": 12.0, "overall_weight": 2.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 20.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E4", "name": "Appeal notice, handling and timeliness", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 3.6, "status": "sufficient", "score": 37.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E5", "name": "Consistency across similar requests", "internal_weight": 12.0, "overall_weight": 2.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 2.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E6", "name": "Denial rates and nonexempt-portion consideration", "internal_weight": 8.0, "overall_weight": 1.6, "status": "sufficient", "score": 30.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "E7", "name": "Fee challenges and appeal outcomes", "internal_weight": 10.0, "overall_weight": 2.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 56.0, "applicable": true } ] }, { "id": "F", "name": "Public Communication", "weight": 10.0, "coverage": 100.0, "assessed": true, "score": 31.72, "indicators": [ { "id": "F1", "name": "Clarity and accuracy of written communications", "internal_weight": 24.0, "overall_weight": 2.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 18.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "F2", "name": "Identified contacts and clarification", "internal_weight": 18.0, "overall_weight": 1.8, "status": "sufficient", "score": 67.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "F3", "name": "Consistency between public statements and records", "internal_weight": 20.0, "overall_weight": 2.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 28.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "F4", "name": "Correction and explanation of errors", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 1.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 6.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "F5", "name": "Cost and options communication", "internal_weight": 14.0, "overall_weight": 1.4, "status": "sufficient", "score": 15.0, "applicable": true }, { "id": "F6", "name": "Public FOIA instructions and accessibility", "internal_weight": 10.0, "overall_weight": 1.0, "status": "sufficient", "score": 68.0, "applicable": true } ] } ], "methodology_version": "1.2.0" }, "schema_version": 1 }