Pleas, trials, outcomes
What happened in individual cases: charges authorized or declined, guilty pleas and plea agreements, bench and jury trials, and sentences. This is the case-level detail behind the aggregate counts.
Asked for twelve monthly felony-authorization counts, the office conceded the data exists, refused the arithmetic, and blamed the requester's own cost-saving clause.
A narrowed request for 2025 felony sex-offense charging records, granted in part and priced at $82.66 with a $41.33 deposit — while the office's own case-volume figures and its Karpel database go unaddressed.
The office says it never kept plea-offer data, then bills $23,146.66 for a 4,000-file review its own footnote calls moot if the twin invoice is paid. The one thing it produced — 62 trials — it got from a calendar, not the files.
The office says no statistical report exists — then offers to compile the statistics for $34,720, using a case count it has never counted. Its own five-category backlog definition suggests the numbers are a query away.
The office said it was disqualified in 2022, the AG disagreed, and in 2024 the office decided on its own that no new review was needed.
A four-day, zero-dollar denial that checks “Exempt from Disclosure” and “Record Does Not Exist” on the same form — then points to a 25-135 production that contains four jury trial sheets.
A ten-day extension for the “volume” of records, then a certificate that no records exist. No fee, no pages, no exemption cited.
Summary of every criminal case prosecuted to trial in calendar year 2024, with case number, defendant initials, charges, trial outcome and felony/misdemeanor classification
Deadline extended, then a $1,041.60 quote and a $520.80 deposit demanded before a single page is produced.
Three years of warrant counts by police agency released. Case-outcome and performance records: said not to exist.
